Monday, September 10, 2007

Egon Schiele II

Last time I introduced Schiele to my Blog. This time I delve a little bit deeper as I am a great admirer of his raw depictions of human forms and flesh. Schiele is known to have been a pupil of Gustav Klimt, who is widely known for idealising the human form. Klimt's objects were mostly portrayed as elegant fin-de-siecle figures, but Schiele's models (both male, female and his self- portraits) are raw and make the viewer aware of his vulnerability.

Why are the two painters, who shared so much in common, then so different? I explained a bit of the reasoning behind this already in my previous post. The plausible and perhaps single most important reason for Schiele's rigid way of depicting human forms is the conservative Viennese milieu he resided in. I reckon that the claustrophobic nature of Austria at that time (and especially Vienna) arose a certain anger (or perhaps better "urge") in the young painter. The fact that Schiele got arrested for his depiction of naked females is clear evidence for his struggle with social order.

Schiele died at the age of 28, far too young for such a brilliant mind...


Update: Matt sent me an email about the new Artsy's Gustav Klimt page:
We strive to make all of the world’s art accessible to anyone online. Our Gustav Klimt page, for example, provides visitors with Klimt's bio, over 130 of his works, exclusive articles, and up-to-date Klimt exhibition listings. The page even includes related artist & category tags, plus suggested contemporary artists, allowing viewers to continue exploring art beyond our Klimt page.

0 Comments: